Zambia Court Blocks President Lungu
The Zambia court blocks Lungu from contesting the 2026 presidential elections, delivering a landmark ruling on the country’s two-term presidential limit.
The Constitutional Court declared that former President Edgar Lungu, who served two terms in office, remains ineligible for re-election. This decision concludes a prolonged legal debate about Lungu’s eligibility.
Constitutional Court Upholds Two-Term Presidential Limit
In its definitive ruling, Zambia’s Constitutional Court emphasized that Edgar Lungu had already been elected twice and served the maximum terms allowed by law. The court rejected Lungu’s argument that his first term of 20 months should not count because it resulted from completing the late President Michael Sata’s tenure. 
The court stated unequivocally: “Mr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu has therefore been twice elected and has twice held office. The constitution makes him ineligible to participate in any future elections as a presidential candidate.”
Opposition Alliance’s Strategy Faces Setback
Lungu had recently been selected by the opposition Tonse Alliance as their candidate for the 2026 presidential election. This ruling disrupts their plans, forcing them to reconsider their strategy.
The controversy surrounding Lungu’s political comeback included his public jogging campaigns, which authorities labeled as “political activism.” This activism, combined with the loss of his retirement benefits and privileges, had reignited debates about his political ambitions.
President Hichilema’s Administration Welcomes Legal Clarity
The government celebrated the ruling, describing it as a victory for Zambia’s democracy. Attorney General Mulilo Kabesha stated, “This decision provides legal clarity for citizens and safeguards our democracy, allowing us to look forward to free, fair, and competitive elections in 2026.”
This sentiment comes amid allegations of political manipulation from Lungu’s camp. The former president criticized the ruling, claiming it demonstrated “the erosion of judicial independence” and the “weaponisation of institutions.”
Judicial Reforms Follow Political Turmoil
Lungu’s political trajectory has not been without controversy. Last October, President Hichilema dismissed three judges who had allowed Lungu to stand in the 2021 elections. The Judicial Complaints Commission found the judges guilty of misconduct, leading to their removal.
This backdrop underscores ongoing tensions in Zambia’s judiciary and its role in shaping political narratives.
Zambia Court Ruling Reinforces Democratic Principles
In addition to ending the former president’s campaign for reelection, Zambia’s court blocking the Lungu ruling reaffirms the nation’s adherence to democratic principles. Zambia sets a standard for open government by maintaining the two-term limit stipulated in the constitution.
This decision offers citizens renewed confidence in the judiciary and encourages a competitive political atmosphare for the 2026 elections.
Read More:
