Dele Farotimi Defamation Case
In a heated legal battle that has drawn widespread attention, a Chief Magistrates Court in Ado Ekiti has ordered the remand of human rights lawyer Dele Farotimi.
Accused of defaming Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Chief Afe Babalola in his book, ‘Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System’, Farotimi now faces a 16-count charge of defamation, cyberstalking, and related offenses. 
The unfolding Dele Farotimi defamation case has sparked debates on legal ethics, freedom of expression, and the Nigerian justice system.
Chief Magistrate Abayomi Adeosun presided over the case and denied Farotimi’s bail application, ordering his remand in the Ado Ekiti Correctional Centre. The magistrate stated, “The defendant should file a formal application for bail,” before adjourning the case to December 10, 2024, for further hearing.
Lawyers Clash Over Bail in the Dele Farotimi Defamation Case
During the arraignment, police prosecutor Samson Osubu called for the defendant’s remand pending further investigations. In his argument, Osubu claimed that Farotimi’s alleged offenses were serious enough to justify custodial detention.
However, Farotimi’s counsel, Barrister Dayo Akeredolu, countered with a plea for bail on self-recognition, emphasizing that his client posed no threat to public safety.
Akeredolu argued, “This is a bailable offense, and my client is a respected public figure presumed innocent until proven guilty.” Despite this, the court declined the request for bail, highlighting the complexities surrounding cases of this nature.
What Sparked the Dele Farotimi Defamation Case?
The accusations stem from statements in Farotimi’s book that alleged Chief Afe Babalola had compromised the Supreme Court. The Ekiti State Police Command revealed that the charges against Farotimi include defamation of character and cyberstalking.
According to Ekiti State Commissioner of Police, Adeniran Akinwale, the allegations were “fully established” during their preliminary investigation.
Akinwale further stated, “Our investigation aims to determine the extent of Farotimi’s culpability or otherwise.” He defended the actions of his officers, dismissing allegations that the arrest undermined democratic principles.
Public Reactions to the Dele Farotimi Defamation Case
The arrest and subsequent remand of Dele Farotimi have triggered mixed reactions. Prominent figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, have described the incident as reminiscent of military dictatorship.
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and human rights lawyer Femi Falana have also condemned the arrest, calling it an attack on free speech.
One source close to the case pointed on Farotimi’s refusal to retract his statements despite multiple requests. “He is standing firm on his position, and that’s why the case escalated to this level,” the source disclosed.
What Lies Ahead in the Dele Farotimi Defamation Case?
The case is set to continue on December 10, with Farotimi’s legal team expected to file a formal bail application. As debates rage on, the legal proceedings promise to test Nigeria’s balance between defamation laws and constitutional rights.
With the Dele Farotimi defamation case raising critical questions about freedom of expression, do you believe the law should strike a better balance between free speech and defamation protection?
Read More:
