Gupta Son Loses Citizenship
In a significant turn of events, Kamal Singhala, the son of fugitive Ajay Gupta, loses his South African citizenship.
The Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber recently delivered this news through a formal letter, demanding that Singhala return his naturalization certificate. 
This development follows the discovery of serious irregularities in the citizenship application process that Singhala underwent back in 2015.
Irregularities in the Citizenship Approval Process
Initially, Singhala’s application for South African citizenship faced rejection on January 22, 2015, by then-Minister Malusi Gigaba. The department’s review committee recommended this decision based on various concerns.
However, just nine months later, Gigaba approved a second application, despite regulations under Section 5(8) of the Citizenship Act, which clearly state that applicants must wait one year before reapplying. This blatant disregard for the rules raises concern and questions about the integrity of the approval process.
In September, Schreiber granted Singhala a mere 15 days to present his case in person, urging him to explain why the government should not revoke his citizenship.
Although Singhala submitted written representations, he failed to address the core issues. Instead, he chose to criticize Schreiber’s integrity and disparage his staff, which only weakened his position, as noted in the minister’s letter.
Legal Challenges Ahead for Singhala
Schreiber’s letter highlights that Singhala’s attacks did not tackle the critical issue of his failure to adhere to the one-year waiting period before reapplying for citizenship.
Furthermore, Ashu Chawla, director of the Gupta company Oakbay Investments, argued in a motivational letter to Gigaba that Singhala’s application deserved approval due to “exceptional circumstances” linked to Oakbay’s investments in South Africa.
However, Schreiber dismissed this motivation outright, stating that none of the applicants for citizenship held directorial positions in the company at the time of the second application.
Reports indicate that Singhala plans to challenge Schreiber’s decision in court, signaling a potential legal battle ahead. This situation not only affects Singhala but also raises broader questions about the integrity of South Africa’s immigration policies.
This situation sheds light on significant irregularities in the citizenship approval process. As Singhala prepares to contest this decision, the implications of this case extend far beyond his personal circumstances. It reflects deeper issues within South Africa’s immigration and citizenship policies.
What do you think about the ramifications of this case for future citizenship applications? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Read More:
